Computed Tomography Technologist Practice Exam 2025 - Free CT Technologist Practice Questions and Study Guide

The statement that xenon gas detectors are easier to calibrate than solid-state detectors is correct due to the distinct operational principles underlying each type of detection technology. Xenon gas detectors utilize a gas-filled chamber that responds to ionizing radiation, producing signals that can be straightforwardly calibrated based on known energy levels of radiation. This process tends to be less complicated than the calibration of solid-state detectors, which rely on semiconductor materials where factors such as temperature, material impurities, and electronic noise can significantly influence the signal and make calibration more complex.

In contrast to solid-state detectors, which may require extensive adjustments and multiple calibration steps to achieve accurate readings, xenon gas detectors can often be calibrated more easily due to their more linear response characteristics under controlled conditions. This inherent simplicity in the calibration process is a major advantage when ensuring accurate radiation measurements.

While xenon gas detectors may still require recalibration over time, particularly after significant operational changes or environmental shifts, the initial calibration process remains relatively user-friendly compared to their solid-state counterparts. Hence, the statement emphasizing the ease of calibration for xenon gas detectors highlights a key operational benefit, making it the correct choice in this context.